Bring in the Right People: Don’t Be Afraid to Hire People Smarter Than You
Q: What do the following words and phrases have in common?
A: They are all words used by George W. Bush, or about him, in any discussion about bringing in the right people. In most organizations, we say that we’re going to “interview” someone;—Bush says he’s going to “recruit” someone. We say we’re going to “decide on who we want to hire”; W. says he’s going to “choose.” We say we’re going to “offer the person the job”; he says he’s going to “convince the person to join our team.” We say we’re going to “advertise the position”; Bush says “I found the person.” What’s the difference between George’s words and ours? His are about selling himself, the organization, the cause, and the position to the right person for the situation. Ours are about the job candidates’ selling themselves, and us deciding to buy or not. Bush’s process is about research, personality fit, and persuasion. G.W. determines what’s needed for a particular position and who has those skills, characteristics, and attributes. He discovers whether the position and organization match someone before he interviews that person. His interviews thus can focus on how the person’s personality melds with Bush’s, and he prides himself on being a good judge of people. We believe that Bush’s way works (and believe us when we say we’re not using information about people’s backgrounds to discriminate against them; one of us is an HR professional!). Like Bush, we use such information to understand where the person is coming from. Doing that allows Bush to get a sense of what a person believes and where he or she is going. He hears candidates’ core values and learns their priorities by asking about their background and family. Core values and priorities rarely roll off the tongue in response to a question like “What are your core values?” (They will, of course, for you, now that you’ve read chapter 1, “What Do You Stand For?” In fact, you need to know your values so that you can determine whether a job candidate’s match well with yours.) Learning peoples’ core values and priorities by talking with them about their backgrounds in general is legally risky. You’ll have information that can’t easily be proven to be related directly to the skills needed for the position. Nevertheless, this information will tell you things about the candidates’ characteristics and attributes that are hard to verify through research alone. An interview of this sort tells Bush, and it can tell you, their core values. Knowing that their values match yours is crucial to bringing in the right person. Bush takes the legal risk that he might be called upon to prove that he didn’t use information about a person’s background to discriminate against that person. We take that legal risk too, and we take it every time because the benefits (a match with our core values) outweigh the risk (hiring the wrong person). Bush’s thorough researching before interviewing keeps the legal liability down. By learning what he needs for a position and only talking with people who have those skills, characteristics, and attributes, he only interviews people who are so close to right that all it takes is the persuasion –– and he’s a master at this! Clearly, Bush’s leadership genius in bringing in the right people lies not just in his research and persuasion abilities, but also in his willingness to hire people who are smarter than he is—no matter whose appointee they were. So check your ego at the door, and then get on with the recruiting! excerpted with permission from The Leadership Genius of George W. Bush,
De-motivational Images* Success is knowing who to blame for failures. * Consulting: If you’re not a part of the solution, there’s good money to be made in prolonging the problem. * Humiliation: The harder you try, the dumber you look. * Apathy: If we don’t take care of the customers, maybe they’ll stop bugging us. From http://www.despair.com. They sell everything from gorgeous posters to conversation hearts with “de-motivating” quotes. There’s a lot to be learned from quotes that tell us “how NOT to do it” and it gets a good laugh, allowing us to retain it longer!
Don Page, the first reader to call in his comments on Carolyn’s new book, The Leadership Genius of George W. Bush: “I loved it! It was fun to read and I’m going to recommend it to the president of our company. My boss just returned from a company planning retreat and he was very excited about the direction we’re going. The skills described in detail in the book will help us all.
Upgrade Your New Employee Orientation for Faster “Start Time” to “Productive Employee Time”The first week on the job plays a crucial role in inspiring, motivating and retaining new employees. We often spend lots of time and money recruiting and wooing new employees and as soon as they start we turn around and treat them like barely welcome strangers. We need to begin looking at recruiting as only half of the task of hiring. Orientation is the other, often ignore, element.
Goals of Great Orientation Programs * Time to productivity. Any delay in providing new hires with the guidance, equipment and training they need can slow the time it takes for a new employee to reach their minimum expected level of productivity. * Your image as “the best place to work”. How you treat the person during this crucial period has a direct impact on what they say when colleagues ask what it’s like to work there (future recruiting). * Setting manager’s expectations. On the first day, it’s important for the manager to make sure that the new employee knows the manager’s expectations, the departmental goals, the organization’s goals, and what important contributions the employee can make to the product, services, and the customer. * Understanding the employee's expectations. It’s equally important for the manager to find out what expectations the new employee has in the areas of training, promotion and preferred management and communication styles. * Explaining the employee’s "shared responsibility”. Begin by communicating to the new employee that they have to take a proactive role in "helping" their manager understand what it is that motivates and frustrates them. * Reinforce their decision. Reinforce the sale, answer their questions, eliminate their fears, and give them something to tell their friends. excerpted from an article on the electronic recruiting exchange, by Dr. John Sullivan What to Do in a Great Orientation Program: * Give them an introduction to your organization * Introduce them to co-workers in their department and others (inside and outside the organization) * Have each of the people they’ll be working with spend time with them (in department and outside) giving them info about their skills, knowledge, fun things to know about them * Provide them with a tour of all facilities * Include them in all organization activities early * Provide training in their basic job duties and responsibilities (best done by co-workers and supervisor) * Review all important policies and practices (especially those that aren't written) * Provide an overview of benefits and services (get them to ask questions) * Discuss their career and life needs/goals and what inspires them to do a great job and how the organization can meet them * Discuss your expectations and those of the organization
Training Only Works if Reinforcement Methods are Built InMost of us have noticed over the years that HR, Training & Development departments, and outside vendors provided wonderful one-shot trainings that participants would rank (at the end of the sessions) very high, but when the participants got back to work, they rarely used the skills or knowledge from the one-shot sessions. This lack of transfer of training seemed to be true even if the one-shot sessions included learning methods that involved real-world issues and lots of preaching about the importance of transferring information to experiences. So we developed a list of all the reinforcement methods we could think of. Before designing any training, we work with the learners, their co-workers, and supervisors to choose just the ones they’ll actually do. Then we design it into the training, so it doesn’t feel like something extra. Part of the key to the approach is the words you use. We never say, “After the training, ...”. Instead, we say, (for example): “On Friday you’ll meet with your supervisor to tell him what, specifically, you did that week that related to the skills in the session on Monday.” Use the list below, exerpted from Creating Highly Interactive Training Quickly & Effectively, by Carolyn B. Thompson, pp. 19 & 20: * Actively participate in
determining training needs
The Best Approach to Managing Conflicts Between Employees Will Surprise YouDuh! (as I slap my forehead!) Why didn’t we realize this? - Gregorio Billikopf Encina tells the Training Ideas listserve: Years ago, I accepted a challenge to mediate a deep-seated conflict between two agricultural mechanics, and stumbled onto an intuitive approach that challenges some long standing tenets of mediation practice. We often hear about the importance of creative thinking and thinking outside the box. In this particular instance, I simply did not realize where that box was, and how unique this approach was when contrasted to the conventional one espoused by most authors and researchers. In the conventional approach, mediators bring both parties together and give each stakeholder an opportunity to present his or her case while the other listens. Or rather, as each side keeps interrupting as sparks fly. Defenders of the traditional approach feel that these outbreaks are a normal part of the process and remind stakeholders of what does not work. In reality, the mediator and the stakeholders lose face when these outbursts take place. In the approach I developed, the best approach, the stakeholders meet separately with the mediator in a pre-caucus before ever coming together in a joint session. This flies against the conventional approach, where it is feared that each stakeholder may attempt to influence the mediator to take his or her side. One reason that gives validity to this fear in the conventional approach, is that the mediator plays a role that often takes on characteristics of arbitration. In arbitration the third party suggests or enforces solutions while in mediation the parties, in theory, have control over the decisions made. In contrast, I use the pre-caucusing or separate meeting to listen and coach each stakeholder so that he or she will be able to present his or her case. During the joint session, I play a minor role as a mediator. Most of the work I do takes place during the pre-caucus. As a result of the pre-caucusing: * Stakeholders are better prepared to face their contender and negotiate a solution directly with the other stakeholder. * Parties in conflict directly address each other in the joint session, rather than through the mediator. This study may well change the future of mediation and do much to increase peace and promote effective interpersonal conflict management. The article that fully describes this process can be found at http://www.cnr.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7research/Pre-Caucus2.pdf. Thanks, Gregorio, for giving us a way that finally works!
Put the TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC. site on your Windows taskbar! Right click blank area of taskbar, select Toolbars/New Toolbar, in new Toolbar box, enter http://www.trainingsys.com. WWW.TRAININGSYS.COM Get FREE access to great recruiting, inspiring, training & retaining tips, ideas & resources where you can:
“The Leadership Genius of George W. Bush”. ** New interviews added every day! E-mail TSI@trainingsys.com to get an updated list! ** Go to Amazon.com to read a chapter! ** Visit W.H. Smith’s display on tables in the front of each store when you’re in the airport during January! ** Buy “The Leadership Genius of George W. Bush” NOW at Amazon.com! January 28-29,2003
January 27-February 3, 2003 February 2-4, 2003
February 3, 2003 February 24-26, 2003
February 23-28,2003
March 7-9, 2003 March 10-12,2003 March 31-April 2, 2003 April 4-6, 2003
April 7, 2003 April 9-11, 2003
April 12-15, 2003 April 13-14, 2003
April 23-25,2003 Copyright 2003 TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC. All rights reserved. **FORWARD Recruit, Inspire & Retain TO OTHERS **GET ISSUES YOU MISSED AT OUR WEB SITE **ARTICLE REPRINTS FOR Recruit, Inspire & Retain An ideal way to introduce new ideas or stimulate learning with the employees in your organization. Article reprints can also serve as a powerful promotional or sales tool - include them with your brochures, newsletters & media kits. For complete information on article reprints or copyright permission, call 1-800-469-3560 or e-mail rir@trainingsys.com **YOU HAVE UNIQUE, VALUABLE KNOWLEDGE FOR OTHERS We’d love to print your articles on recruiting,
inspiring, training and retaining employees.
Recruit, Inspire & Retain contains links to web sites operated by organizations other than TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC. These links are for your convenience and we assume no responsibility for the content or operations of those sites. Recruit, Inspire & Retain is a
free e-zine of TRAINING SYSTEMS,
INC. Visit us at http://www.trainingsys.com soon!
|